Climate change in Australia
It’s hardly surprising that this clown’s entire ‘what if’ argument is ripped off from Pascal’s Wager on the existence of ‘god’ (look it up) - as climate change alarmism is as much a fear/faith-based religion as many other recognised ones, and non-believers are scornfully denounced. Just substitute “heretic” or “infidel” for “denier”, and you get the picture.
As is usual for many religions, the highest profile evangelists profit greatly at their followers’ expense - as we’ve seen with well-known climate con-artists like Al Gore, David Suzuki and Tim Flannery. Unfortunately, non-believers also are forced to pay the price of others’ hysterical climate zealotry.
Is “leftards” your answer for everything these days?
Clearly, it’s not.
It’s simply a more succinct way of describing “ignorant, delusional, gullible left-whingers who perpetually eschew rational practicality in favour of irrational ideology”.
Do you use leftard because so many people get offended when called “sheeple” because sheeple isn’t succinct enough?
People must struggle to understand “leftards, ignorant, delusional, gullible” etc because they don’t comprehend what those words imply.
Each and everyone of us suffer some form of left-wing viewpoints (unless they suffer incomplete mental development).
Leftards have no idea they are leftards because they are so far out on the wing tips they’ve lost sense of reality.
Without leftards the world might be a boring place and the right-wing would fail to keep the bird aloft.
Do you use leftard because so many people get offended when called “sheeple” because sheeple isn’t succinct enough?
They’re not the same thing - but they’re by no means mutually exclusive. All leftards are sheeple, but not all sheeple are leftards.
Each and everyone of us suffer some form of left-wing viewpoints . . .
Yeah, pretty much all people suffer from bouts of irrationality or delusional ideology at some stage in their lives. Thankfully, through life experience, those who are intelligent enough to do so, grow out of it.
Leftards have no idea they are leftards because they are so far out on the wing tips they’ve lost sense of reality.
Very true, and leftards breed leftardism like a virus - so they need to be stopped..
Without leftards the world might be a boring place and the right-wing would fail to keep the bird aloft.
If by “a boring place” you mean a distinct lack of moronically specious political correctness, of rampant hypocrisy, of ludicrously draconian bureaucracy, of pitifully castrated legal systems resulting in skyrocketing crime and insurance rates, of mindlessly indoctrinated children wrapped in cotton wool, or of morally corrupt governments shamelessly feeding at the public trough while irresponsibly squandering taxpayers’ money on asinine, ideologically delusional futility then yeah, I guess the world might be a “boring place” without leftards to selfishly and ignorantly butt rape western society.
*sigh*
Without leftards the world might be a boring place and the right-wing would fail to keep the bird aloft.
If by “a boring place” you mean a distinct lack of moronically specious political correctness, of rampant hypocrisy, of ludicrously draconian bureaucracy, of pitifully castrated legal systems resulting in skyrocketing crime and insurance rates, of mindlessly indoctrinated children wrapped in cotton wool, or of morally corrupt governments shamelessly feeding at the public trough while irresponsibly squandering taxpayers’ money on asinine, ideologically delusional futility then yeah, I guess the world might be a “boring place” without leftards to selfishly and ignorantly butt rape western society.
*sigh*
That would be world without a right wing, and the bird would still fail to fly. That sounds very much like the current social system we live in, sadly. And, well the bird struggles to fly.
The bird needs both wings to stay functional, left and right.
With neither extreme of view the world would be boring, it wouldn’t fly either because it wouldn’t have wings.
Just imagine a world that chucky had no one to antagonise; how bored would you be, what would you write about?
. . . a distinct lack of moronically specious political correctness, of rampant hypocrisy, of ludicrously draconian bureaucracy, of pitifully castrated legal systems resulting in skyrocketing crime and insurance rates, of mindlessly indoctrinated children wrapped in cotton wool, or of morally corrupt governments shamelessly feeding at the public trough while irresponsibly squandering taxpayers’ money on asinine, ideologically delusional futility then yeah, I guess the world might be a “boring place” without leftards to selfishly and ignorantly butt rape western society.
That would be world without a right wing . . .
WTF?!?!?!
I’m just going to go ahead and assume you’re joking - because that’s one of the most ludicrously moronic things I’ve ever read.
That sounds very much like the current social system we live in . . .
This is what makes me think you’re definitely joking - because, of course, “the current social system we live in” has all that I described in abundance.
Just imagine a world that chucky had no one to antagonise; how bored would you be, what would you write about?
If, by “no one to antagonise”, what you really mean is nobody doing or saying anything that prompts me to react to their monumental idiocy, then I’d say that’d be a perfect world.
And not one Leftard!!!!!
Ha, get that into ya, Deano!!!!!
Well, proved me wrong!
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/09/rising-seas/if-ice-melted-map
* Just to stir the pot a little. 
^ It makes you wonder why anyone would be gullible enough to support Tim Flannery (or his greedy, self-serving ‘Climate Council’ scam) when he own a huge waterfront property.
^ It makes you wonder why anyone would be gullible enough to support Tim Flannery (or his greedy, self-serving ‘Climate Council’ scam) when he own a huge waterfront property.
Really?
How high above current sea level is his house built?
I don’t know the exact figures, and of course dodgy Flannery publicly claims it’s high enough not to be affected at all by rises in sea level (he’ll do anything to perpetuate his scam) - but the truth is that the property is only accessible by water, so that’s a blatant lie. Unless he lives on a cliff, the fact that it’s “WATERFRONT property” is enough to show that he’s full of shit. Once again it shows that he’s simply making up as he goes along, just to suit his own selfish agenda.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/09/rising-seas/if-ice-melted-map
* Just to stir the pot a little.
First word - “If”!!!!!
If I still had hair, I might be a Super Model!!!!!
“If”!!!!!
If Jeremy had pursued his Ice Dancing Career, he would be in the Sochi Games!!!!!
“If”!!!!!
I love you guys 
You know, all of this talk about Climate Change and the proven Science that CO2 is the driving force!!!!!
Why is it that we spend billions of dollars worldwide continuing to study the effects, when this money would be better spent addressing the causes?????
And why is it that the very people that not only benefit from this money, but are also firm believers, aren’t forgoing this cash in order to save our planet?????