The BOARDWORLD Forums ran from 2009 to 2021 and are now closed and viewable here as an archive

   

Shaun White: Its Not Hate Its Disappointment

Avatar

Shaun White is awesome. He’s out there, snowboarding and skating in some way that let’s face it, none of us here could do (sorry all you BW legends- and Deano).

Who knows what he’s like in his head? In his family? Maybe he is on the autism spectrum. I know plenty of people who are particularly good at what they can do, but looking outside the square isn’t on their agenda. Social skills lacking, the focus is just on getting the job done. I have no idea if this IS Shaun White. But it might be.

Why hate him? Who has time or energy to HATE another person who really has done nothing to harm them or their family. Every sport/job/government/profession/religion/belief system/etc has people we do not admire, or respect. And this is from our viewpoint.

I am never going to meet Shaun White. If we sat down face to face, and talked, I might find he wasn’t the kind of person I respected.

There’s a lot of people who have a public persona that’s very different to their private persona.


 
Avatar
Azz - 06 November 2013 05:53 PM

So a thread about how Shaun White is loved and hated has turned into this mess.

Chuck, pull your head in mate, you are really pissing people off acting like you do.
What exactly do you want to get out of your ranting?

I think I can speak for most of regular posters on here that we are tired of your ranting, personal attacks and general bullshit you go on with.
Can you either cease with the rubbish or fuck off to somewhere else where there are others that enjoy what you do please?

I have had enough.

The initial “personal attack” in this thread didn’t come from me, I simply returned fire (as is pretty much always the case) - and as you’ve chosen to ignore that pertinent factor, I really couldn’t give a crap what you think.

 

 
Avatar

Well thats good to know, chuck.

So you going to fuck off somewhere else now?  smirk

 
Avatar

Thanks, Azz!

 
Avatar
chucky - 06 November 2013 12:06 PM
Andy Aitken - 02 November 2013 02:27 AM

Is Snowboarding destroyed now? Hardly. It’s doing great and just added another SB event to the Olympics.

The Olympics is hardly the benchmark for snowboarding success. We should NOT view the FIS/IOC making snowboarding their b!tch as cause for celebration.

Andy Aitken - 02 November 2013 02:27 AM

All he has done is compete like crazy, pick up a few cheesy sponsors and wear his pants too tight.

I think he’s an awesome pipe jock - but does that excuse the fact that off the board, he’s a dick?

Andy Aitken - 02 November 2013 02:27 AM

What’s the difference between him and Kelly Clark?

KC will tell anyone who’ll listen how wonderful her ‘god’ is, while SW will tell anyone who’ll listen how wonderful HE is.

I like that Azz is trying to keep things friendly. We are all mates here after all. But I don’t feel like Chucky is attacking me. He’s just giving his thoughts on things I (and others) said. Nothing wrong with that if it’s friendly. If I’m gunna put my opinion out there I expect to hear other peoples as well.

SO to reply to these in order:
- No the Olympics certainly don’t represent everything we do. But it was just an example of how the snowboarding is staying strong. The Skiers are coming back you know!  gulp  Also, did I celebrate Slopestyle becoming an olympic event? Damn right I did!
- I don’t really know of a time when he has been a dick to anyone.
- He may have a slight ego. Much less than most athletes at the top of their game. But more than most snowboarders I guess. I’ll give u that one, but I’ve never thought “geez this guy loves himself”. It’s pretty slight.

And as for the “Censored” word. I wasn’t talking about the word B I T C H.
The author said that “Shaun White is the A^@L Sex of snowboarding”. What a horrible way to sum up someone’s career. I don’t care what his reasons are, there’s no call for that. I see Shaun as the Michael Jackson of snowboarding. He’s been doing it since he was a kid. He has been raised in a weird twisted media environment. He’s not going to be normal. But he does what he knows and gives his all. Imagine working your whole life for something, only to have people say things like that about you.

 
Avatar
chucky - 06 November 2013 06:06 PM

The initial “personal attack” in this thread didn’t come from me, I simply returned fire (as is pretty much always the case) - and as you’ve chosen to ignore that pertinent factor, I really couldn’t give a crap what you think.

No, it started with an attack on Jez, and the way he chooses to operate his site!!!!!

Followed by the “Pussies” remark!!!!!

VVVVV

chucky - 06 November 2013 01:36 PM

What a load of weak, impotent, PC bollocks.

In what way exactly was MY use of the word “derogatory towards women”? As with many other words, it now has more than one meaning - and it was the most appropriate word to use in the context in which I used it.

It’s not difficult to see why even though Boardworld has almost 70,000 social media subscribers, not even one percent of them are motivated to interact on the forums. Perhaps a GetUp! or Greens sponsorship might pick things up, or a merger with the Country Women’s Association? Pussies.

 
Avatar
Andy Aitken - 06 November 2013 06:36 PM

We are all mates here after all.

THIS is why I started Boardworld.

Guys, please drop this issue and let’s carry on with the original discussion, or I’m going to close the thread (and you know I HATE doing that).

You’ve all made your points. It’s over.

 
Avatar
Azz - 06 November 2013 06:10 PM

Well thats good to know, chuck.

So you going to fuck off somewhere else now?  smirk

Shove it up your self-righteous arse. Don’t like what I write, don’t read it.

 

 
Avatar
Mizu Kuma - 06 November 2013 06:57 PM
chucky - 06 November 2013 06:06 PM

The initial “personal attack” in this thread didn’t come from me, I simply returned fire (as is pretty much always the case) - and as you’ve chosen to ignore that pertinent factor, I really couldn’t give a crap what you think.

No, it started with an attack on Jez, and the way he chooses to operate his site!!!!!

Followed by the “Pussies” remark!!!!!

VVVVV

chucky - 06 November 2013 01:36 PM

What a load of weak, impotent, PC bollocks.

In what way exactly was MY use of the word “derogatory towards women”? As with many other words, it now has more than one meaning - and it was the most appropriate word to use in the context in which I used it.

It’s not difficult to see why even though Boardworld has almost 70,000 social media subscribers, not even one percent of them are motivated to interact on the forums. Perhaps a GetUp! or Greens sponsorship might pick things up, or a merger with the Country Women’s Association? Pussies.

Duh, a “personal attack” is the act of attacking someone “personally”, as opposed to their stance or argument - and the “Pussies” comment referred to the groups I mentioned (well, not so much the CWA - that was more in relation to you lot carrying on like a bunch of old women).

 
Avatar
Andy Aitken - 06 November 2013 06:36 PM

. . . I don’t feel like Chucky is attacking me. He’s just giving his thoughts on things I (and others) said.

Exactly. If only everyone else was as smart as you.

 

 
Avatar

*sigh*

 
Avatar
chucky - 06 November 2013 07:13 PM
Mizu Kuma - 06 November 2013 06:57 PM
chucky - 06 November 2013 06:06 PM

The initial “personal attack” in this thread didn’t come from me, I simply returned fire (as is pretty much always the case) - and as you’ve chosen to ignore that pertinent factor, I really couldn’t give a crap what you think.

No, it started with an attack on Jez, and the way he chooses to operate his site!!!!!

Followed by the “Pussies” remark!!!!!

VVVVV

chucky - 06 November 2013 01:36 PM

What a load of weak, impotent, PC bollocks.

In what way exactly was MY use of the word “derogatory towards women”? As with many other words, it now has more than one meaning - and it was the most appropriate word to use in the context in which I used it.

It’s not difficult to see why even though Boardworld has almost 70,000 social media subscribers, not even one percent of them are motivated to interact on the forums. Perhaps a GetUp! or Greens sponsorship might pick things up, or a merger with the Country Women’s Association? Pussies.

Duh, a “personal attack” is the act of attacking someone “personally”, as opposed to their stance or argument.

 

So who ya callin a Pussy then?????

The Country Women’s Association?????

And I’m 100% positive that the “What a load of weak, impotent, PC bollocks” was aimed at Jez’s reply to you!!!!! Seeing that HE was the only one that told you HIS reasonings, it WAS aimed at HIM!!!!! Not Personal????? Bullshit!!!!!

This is probably the only site on the internet that hasn’t banned you, and hell, even after Jez told you the reason why he doesn’t want to have a certain word easily legible on his site, all while not even editing out your use of the word, you go and have a shot at him and how he runs his business!!!!!

You’re the one that keeps shitting in his own nest, in the hope that it’ll clean up the mess, I don’t know?????

If it was my house that you shit in, I would’ve kicked you out a long time ago!!!!!!

Make sure you take your worming tablets tonight!!!!!

 
Avatar
Mizu Kuma - 06 November 2013 07:27 PM

I’m 100% positive that the “What a load of weak, impotent, PC bollocks” was aimed at Jez’s reply to you!!!!!

Duh, of course it was aimed at his “reply”. Not him personally, his “reply”. Duh.

 

 
Avatar
chucky - 06 November 2013 07:53 PM
Mizu Kuma - 06 November 2013 07:27 PM

I’m 100% positive that the “What a load of weak, impotent, PC bollocks” was aimed at Jez’s reply to you!!!!!

Duh, of course it was aimed as his “reply”. Not him personally, his “reply”. Duh.

Are we in the Schoolyard now?????

I’m not aiming this at you personally, but that was the most pathetic response that I’ve ever seen!!!!!

 
Avatar

Perhaps if you took a few remedial reading and comprehension lessons, you wouldn’t jump to ignorant conclusions, and wouldn’t feel stuck back in the “schoolyard”?